Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group
Significance, Uncle Sam And Eligible Young Men, Questions Of Punitive Intent And Compulsion, Marshall's Dissent: "a De Facto Classification Based On Wealth"
Appellant
Selective Service System of the United States
Appellee
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group, et al.
Appellant's Claim
That section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act did not constitute a bill of attainder or a violation of the Fifth Amendment protection against compelled self-incrimination.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Rex E. Lee, U.S. Solicitor General
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
William J. Keppel
Justices for the Court
Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall (Harry A. Blackmun did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
5 July 1984
Decision
That section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act, which denied federal financial assistance to male students between the ages of 18 and 26 who had not registered for the draft, constituted neither a bill of attainder nor a violation of appellees' Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination.
Related Cases
- Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277 (1867).
- Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1867).
- Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967).
- Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968).
- Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70 (1973).
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977).
Sources
University of Minnesota Office of Financial Aid. 1998.
Additional topics
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee - Significance, Near Disaster, Commercial Nuclear Energy
- Schall v. Martin - Significance, Juvenile System Of Justice, Is Teenage Preventive Detention Legal?, Impact, Curfews For Juveniles
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Further Readings
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Significance
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Uncle Sam And Eligible Young Men
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Questions Of Punitive Intent And Compulsion
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Marshall's Dissent: "a De Facto Classification Based On Wealth"
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Impact
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Financial Aid Conditions
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988