Edwards v. Aguillard
Significance, Creationism Act
Appellant
Edwin W. Edwards, Governor of Louisiana
Appellee
Don Aguillard
Appellant's Claim
The Creationism Act was legal.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Wendell R. Bird, Special Assistant Attorney General of Georgia
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Jay Topkis
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
19 June 1987
Decision
The Creationism Act violated the Establishment Clause and was therefore unconstitutional.
Related Cases
- Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947).
- McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 429 (1961).
- Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962).
- Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).
- Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 (1973).
Sources
Sanders, Alain I. "LAW: Memories of the Monkey Trial."Time, 29 June 1997.
Further Readings
- Benen, Steve. "Evolving Debate." Church & State, October 1998, p. 13.
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Lemonick, Michael D. "Dumping on Darwin." Time, March 18, 1996, p. 81.
- Schmidt, Karen. "Creationists Evolve New Strategy." Science, July 26, 1996, p. 420.
Additional topics
- Enmund v. Florida - Significance, The Facts Of The Crime, The Legal Process, Degree Of Responsibility, Implications Of Decision
- Davis v. Bandemer - Significance, A Political Question?, An Agreeable Test, Inconsistent Results, Impact, Further Readings
- Edwards v. Aguillard - Significance
- Edwards v. Aguillard - Creationism Act
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988