New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Significance, Do Students Have The Same Right To Protection Against Unreasonable Search?
That her Fourth Amendment rights regarding search and seizure had been violated.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Lois De Julio
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Allan J. Nodes
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Date of Decision
15 January 1985
Her Fourth Amendment rights had not been violated and illegal drugs found in her purse were admissible as evidence in juvenile proceedings.
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
- Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975).
- Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977).
- Foldesy, George, and Dan King. "Strip Search in Schools: Beyond the Boundries of the Law?" The Clearing House, May-June 1995, p. 275.
- Lieberman, Jethro K. The Evolving Constitution. New York: Random House, 1992.
- Seidman, Louis M., Gerald R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet. Constitutional Law. Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
- New York v. Belton - Significance, Impact
- New Bedford Rape Trial: 1984 - Who's On Trial?, Verdicts And Sentencing, Suggestions For Further Reading:
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Significance
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Do Students Have The Same Right To Protection Against Unreasonable Search?
- Other Free Encyclopedias