New York v. Belton
Significance, Impact
Petitioner
State of New York
Respondent
Roger Belton
Petitioner's Claim
During a lawful arrest of persons riding in an automobile, it is constitutional for the arresting police officer to conduct a warrantless search of the passenger compartment of the arrested person's vehicle and any containers contained therein, and it is constitutional for the arresting officer to search, without a warrant, through an arrestee's jacket.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
James R. Harvey
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Paul J. Cambria, Jr.
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
1 July 1981
Decision
During a lawful arrest, it is constitutional for an officer to conduct a warrantless search of the immediate vicinity, including closed containers and zipped pockets.
Related Cases
- Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959).
- Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969).
- United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973).
- United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).
- California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).
Further Readings
- Schwartz, Herman, ed. The Burger Years: Rights and Wrongs In the Supreme Court, 1969-1986. Nation Enterprises, 1987.
Additional topics
- New York v. Ferber - Significance, Speech Unworthy Of Protecting, A New Speech Category, Impact, Further Readings
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Significance, Do Students Have The Same Right To Protection Against Unreasonable Search?
- New York v. Belton - Significance
- New York v. Belton - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988