New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Significance, Do Students Have The Same Right To Protection Against Unreasonable Search?
Petitioner
T.L.O.
Respondent
New Jersey
Petitioner's Claim
That her Fourth Amendment rights regarding search and seizure had been violated.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Lois De Julio
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Allan J. Nodes
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
15 January 1985
Decision
Her Fourth Amendment rights had not been violated and illegal drugs found in her purse were admissible as evidence in juvenile proceedings.
Related Cases
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
- Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975).
- Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977).
Sources
Findlaw. http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html.
http://www.usdoj.gov.osg/1984/sg840165.txt.
Further Readings
- Foldesy, George, and Dan King. "Strip Search in Schools: Beyond the Boundries of the Law?" The Clearing House, May-June 1995, p. 275.
- Lieberman, Jethro K. The Evolving Constitution. New York: Random House, 1992.
- Seidman, Louis M., Gerald R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet. Constitutional Law. Little, Brown and Company, 1986.
Additional topics
- New York v. Belton - Significance, Impact
- New Bedford Rape Trial: 1984 - Who's On Trial?, Verdicts And Sentencing, Suggestions For Further Reading:
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Significance
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Do Students Have The Same Right To Protection Against Unreasonable Search?
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988