Prince v. Prince
A Step Up, An Informal Marriage, The Court Investigates, Prenuptial Agreements
That she should be provided alimony and child support after her husband deserted her, even when he had no property or fixed or permanent income.
Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff
Chief Defense Lawyers
Benjamin Faneuil Dunkin, Johnson
Charleston, South Carolina
Date of Decision
A husband, when he has the income, is responsible for alimony and child support.
South Carolina took a fresh look at the idea of support for a deserted wife, deciding that a husband who had the means of supporting his wife, even though he had no visible property or fixed and permanent income, should be responsible for alimony and the support of the couple's children.
- In the Matter of Bolling, 56 A.D.2d 722 (1977).
- In re Marriage of Buzzanca, 61 Cal.App. 4th 1410 (1998).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.
- Hoffer, Peter Charles. Law and People in Colonial America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
- Wortman, Marlene Stein. Women in American Law, Vol. I. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, 1985.
- Prize Cases - The Issue Of Belligerency, The Captured Ships, Further Readings
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Significance, Owing Service, Federal Supremacy, Impact, Further Readings
- Prince v. Prince - A Step Up
- Prince v. Prince - An Informal Marriage
- Prince v. Prince - The Court Investigates
- Prince v. Prince - Prenuptial Agreements
- Other Free Encyclopedias