Prigg v. Pennsylvania
Significance, Owing Service, Federal Supremacy, Impact, Further Readings
Appellant
Edward Prigg
Appellee
State of Pennsylvania
Appellant's Claim
That laws passed by the U.S. Congress regulating interstate retrieval of fugitive slaves take precedence over state laws on the same subject.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Meredith, Nelson
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Johnson, Attorney General of Pennsylvania
Justices for the Court
Henry Baldwin, John Catron, Peter Vivian Daniel, John McKinley, Joseph Story (writing for the Court), Roger Brooke Taney, Smith Thompson, James Moore Wayne
Justices Dissenting
John McLean
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
1 March 1842
Decision
Upheld Prigg's claim and overturned two lower courts' decisions convicting Prigg of kidnapping under an 1826 Pennsylvania law.
Related Cases
- The Antelope, 10 Wheat. 66 (1825).
- Jones v. Van Zandt, 5 How. 215 (1848).
- Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859).
- Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941).
- United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
Additional topics
- Prince v. Prince - A Step Up, An Informal Marriage, The Court Investigates, Prenuptial Agreements
- President Andrew Johnson Impeachment Trial: 1868 - Johnson Becomes An Unpopular President, Senate Tries President Johnson, Senate Republicans Thwart Johnson's Defense
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Significance
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Further Readings
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Owing Service
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Federal Supremacy
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882