Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882

Prize Cases - The Issue Of Belligerency, The Captured Ships, Further Readings

war petitioners court blockade

Petitioners

Owners of four ships as claimants: Hiawatha, Crenshaw, Amy Warwick, and Brilliante

Respondent

United States

Petitioners' Claim

That the seizure of these ships for violation of blockade was illegal, because the war was a civil war, not an international war.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioners

Charles Edwards

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Richard Henry Dana, Jr.

Justices for the Court

David Davis, Robert Cooper Grier (writing for the Court), Samuel Freeman Miller, Noah Haynes Swayne, James Moore Wayne

Justices Dissenting

John Catron, Nathan Clifford, Samuel Nelson, Roger Brooke Taney

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

10 March 1863

Decision

The Court ruled the president could insitute a wartime blockade without congressional approval.

Significance

The case determined that the Union government could pursue the naval war against the Confederacy as if it were an international war, using the rules of blockade.

Related Cases

  • Keppel v. Petersburg R. Co., 14 F.Cas. 357 (C.C.D.Va. 1868).
  • Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 571 F.Supp. 1460 (S.D.N.Y. 1983).
Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. the Proprietors of the Warren Bridge - Significance, Two Bridges In Boston, Taney's Defense Of "happiness And Well Being" [next] [back] Prince v. Prince - A Step Up, An Informal Marriage, The Court Investigates, Prenuptial Agreements

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or