Foley v. Connelie
Decision, Significance, The Rights Of Immigrants, Impact
Appellant
Edmund Foley
Appellee
William G. Connelie, S. A. Smith
Appellant's Claim
Edmund Foley, an alien with legal permanent residence in the United States, claimed that his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment were violated because he was excluded by New York State statute from taking a preliminary state police examination.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Jonathan A. Weiss
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Judith A. Gordon
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
22 March 1978
Related Cases
- Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971).
- Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U.S. 634 (1973).
- In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717 (1973).
- Examining Board v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 527 (1976).
- Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976).
- Nyquist v. Mauclet, 432 U.S. 1 (1977).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
Additional topics
- Frontiero v. Richardson - Significance, A Federal Problem, A Matter Of Convenience, Strict Scrutiny, Further Readings
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation - Obscene Or Offensive Speech, Filthy Words, Patently Offensive Language Hits The Fan, Legal Proceedings
- Foley v. Connelie - Decision
- Foley v. Connelie - Significance
- Foley v. Connelie - The Rights Of Immigrants
- Foley v. Connelie - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980