Michigan v. Summers - Significance, Detention While Search Is Conducted Is Reasonable, An Unwarranted Extension Of Terry, Impact
State of Michigan
That a valid warrant to search a person's home also allows the police officers conducting the search to detain the homeowner while the search is being conducted.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Timothy A. Baughman
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Gerald M. Lorence
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart
Date of Decision
22 June 1981
That a warrant to search a home carries with it an implicit authority on the part of the officers executing the warrant to detain the occupants of the home while the search is being conducted.
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
- Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972).
- Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980).
- Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997).
- Dressler, Joshua. Understanding Criminal Procedure. New York: Matthew Bender & Co., 1991.
- LaFave, Wayne R. Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1996.
- Riggs, Jenny L. "Excluding Automobile Passengers from Fourth Amendment Protection." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, spring 1998, p. 957.
- Minneapolis Star v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue - Significance, Equal Treatment Of The Press, Benefit Or Burden?, Impact
- Michigan v. Long - Significance, Deciding The Court's Jurisdiction, Reaction To The "plain Statement" Rule
- Michigan v. Summers - Significance
- Michigan v. Summers - Detention While Search Is Conducted Is Reasonable
- Michigan v. Summers - An Unwarranted Extension Of Terry
- Michigan v. Summers - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias