Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988

Minneapolis Star v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue - Significance, Equal Treatment Of The Press, Benefit Or Burden?, Impact

court appellant decision special

Appellant

Minneapolis Star & Tribune Company

Appellee

Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

Appellant's Claim

That a state special tax assessment on ink and paper used in publication of the Star Tribune newspaper violated freedom of the press.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Lawrence C. Brown

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Paul R. Kempainen, Special Assistant Attorney General of Minnesota

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

William H. Rehnquist

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

29 March 1983

Decision

Upheld the Minnesota Star's claim and overturned the Minnesota Supreme Court's decision that the special tax did not violate the newspaper's constitutional protections.

Related Cases

  • Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233 (1936).
  • National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).
  • Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 (1987).
  • Leathers v. Medlock, 499 U.S. 439 (1991).
  • Turner Broadcasting System v. Federal Communications Commission, 520 U.S. 180 (1994).

Further Readings

  • Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
  • Hawke, Anne and Kevin Donnelly. "Paparazzi." The Quill. September 1998, p. 19.
  • Schwartz, Bernard. Freedom of the Press: Constitutional Issues. New York: Facts on File, Inc., 1992.
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan - Significance, Vestiges Of Old South, "minimal Scrutiny", "intermediate Scrutiny", O'connor Rejects University's Arguments [next] [back] Michigan v. Summers - Significance, Detention While Search Is Conducted Is Reasonable, An Unwarranted Extension Of Terry, Impact

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or