Michigan v. Long
Significance, Deciding The Court's Jurisdiction, Reaction To The "plain Statement" Rule
State of Michigan
That the Michigan Supreme Court had erred in overturning Long's conviction for possession of marijuana, after finding police had used an illegal search to obtain the evidence.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Louis J. Caruso
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
James H. Geary
Justices for the Court
Warren E. Burger, Sandra Day O'Connor (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Date of Decision
6 July 1983
Upheld the petitioner's claim and ordered the lower court to reconsider its decision.
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
- Michigan v. Summers - Significance, Detention While Search Is Conducted Is Reasonable, An Unwarranted Extension Of Terry, Impact
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County - Significance, The California Supreme Court's Ruling, The U.s. Supreme Court's Ruling
- Michigan v. Long - Significance
- Michigan v. Long - Further Readings
- Michigan v. Long - Deciding The Court's Jurisdiction
- Michigan v. Long - Reaction To The "plain Statement" Rule
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988