Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County - Significance, The California Supreme Court's Ruling, The U.s. Supreme Court's Ruling
university justice press petitioner
Petitioner
Michael M.
Respondent
Superior Court of Sonoma County
Petitioner's Claim
That the California "statutory rape" statute unlawfully discriminated on the basis of gender.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Gregory F. Jilka
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Sandy R. Kriegler
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 March 1981
Decision
The Court upheld the statute.
Related Cases
- Kahn v. Shevin, 416 U.S. 351 (1974).
- Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975).
- Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).
Sources
Bureau of Justice Statistics Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics--1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, 1997.
Further Readings
- Baer, Judith. Equality Under the Constitution: Reclaiming the Fourteenth Amendment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.
- Kanowitz, Leo. Equal Rights: The Male Stake. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1981.
- Kirp, David L., Yudof, Mark G., and Strong Franks, Marlene. Gender Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
User Comments