Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee - Significance, Near Disaster, Commercial Nuclear Energy
Estate of Karen Silkwood
Kerr-McGee Nuclear Company
Damages for negligence leading to the plutonium contamination of Karen Silkwood.
Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff
Gerald Spence, Arthur Angel, James Ikard
Chief Defense Lawyers
Elliott Fenton, John Griffin, Jr., Larry D. Ottoway, William Paul, L. E. Stringer, Bill J. Zimmerman
Frank G. Theis
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Date of Decision
18 March 1979
Defendant was found negligent and was ordered to pay $505,000 actual damages, $10 million punitive damages.
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1973).
- Pacific G&E Co. v. State Energy Res. C&D Com., 461 U.S. 190 (1983).
Paehlke, Robert, ed. Conservation and Environmentalism: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland, 1995.
- Kohn, Howard. Who Killed Karen Silkwood? New York: Summit, 1981.
- Rashke, Richard. The Killing of Karen Silkwood. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1981.
- "Silkwood Settlement." Science News, August 8, 1986, p. 134.
- Spence, Gerry. With Justice for None. New York: Times Books, 1989.
- Stein, J. "The Deepening Mystery." Progressive, January 1981, pp. 14-19.
- Solem v. Helm - The Origins Of Proportional Punishment, The Case Of Jerry Helm, Mixed Messages, Lingering Problems
- Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group - Significance, Uncle Sam And Eligible Young Men, Questions Of Punitive Intent And Compulsion, Marshall's Dissent: "a De Facto Classification Based On Wealth"
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee - Significance
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee - Near Disaster
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee - Commercial Nuclear Energy
- Other Free Encyclopedias