Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988 » Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff - Significance, Supreme Court Rules That Public Purpose, Not Public Use, Determines Constitutionality Of A Government Taking Of Land

Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff - Related Cases

united corp

  • United States v. Gettysburg Electric R. Co., 160 U.S. 668 (1896).
  • Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Nebraska, 164 U.S. 403 (1896).
  • Block v. Hirsch, 256 U.S. 135 (1921).
  • Rindge v. Los Angeles, 262 U.S. 700 (1923).
  • Old Dominion Co. v. United States, 269 U.S. 55 (1925).
  • Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Corp., 300 U.S. 55 (1937).
  • United States ex rel. TVA v. Welch, 327 U.S. 546 (1946).
  • Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954).
  • Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland, 437 U.S. 117 (1978).
  • Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93 (1979).
  • Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 (1981).
  • Western and Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 451 U.S. 648 (1981).
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff - The Public Use Clause [next] [back] Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff - Supreme Court Rules That Public Purpose, Not Public Use, Determines Constitutionality Of A Government Taking Of Land

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or