Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980 » Rummel v. Estelle - Three-time Loser, Cruel And Unusual?, The Nature Of Proportionality, Impact, Legal Malpractice

Rummel v. Estelle - Impact

sentencing ruling mandatory michigan

The ruling made it exceedingly difficult to argue the proportionality of sentencing in noncapital cases. The Court subsequently showed flexibility on this issue, however, ruling in Solem v. Helm, (1983) that a recidivist statute in South Dakota which called for mandatory life sentencing without possibility of parole for repeat felons was unconstitutional. The Court has since further complicated its position regarding mandatory felony sentencing, ruling in Harmelin v. Michigan, (1991) that the state of Michigan's statute mandating life sentencing without possibility of parole for first-time felony drug offenders was constitutional.

Rummel v. Estelle - Legal Malpractice [next] [back] Rummel v. Estelle - The Nature Of Proportionality

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or