Parham v. J. R.
Significance, Two Tragic Predicaments, The Due Process Argument, Minors And The Constitution
Appellants
Parham, Commissioner, Department of Human Resources, et al.
Appellees
J. R., et al.
Appellants' Claim
That a federal district court had erred in ruling that a minor was allowed a hearing prior to being committed to a mental institution.
Chief Lawyer for Appellants
John L. Cromartie, Jr.
Chief Lawyer for Appellees
R. Douglas Lackey
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
20 June 1979
Decision
Overturned a lower court's decision that would have barred the commitment of minors to mental institutions without a prior hearing.
Related Cases
- Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
- Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).
Further Readings
- Harvard Law Review, Vol. 93, November 1979, pp. 88-89.
- Kramer, Donald T. Legal Rights of Children, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
- "Mental Health . . . Commitment of Juveniles." ABA Journal, Vol. 65, September, 1979, p. 1391.
Additional topics
- Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton District Attorney - Significance, Regulation--or Censorship?
- Orr v. Orr - Significance, Questions Never Asked, A Woman's Place Is . . ., A Divorce Decision Changes The Meaning Of Marriage
- Parham v. J. R. - Significance
- Parham v. J. R. - Two Tragic Predicaments
- Parham v. J. R. - The Due Process Argument
- Parham v. J. R. - Minors And The Constitution
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980