Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980

Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton District Attorney - Significance, Regulation--or Censorship?

court petitioner william york


Paris Adult Theatre, et al.


Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, et al.

Petitioner's Claim

That the adult films that they were showing were protected under First Amendment Rights.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Thomas E. Moran

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Robert Eugene Smith

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

William J. Brennan, Jr., Potter Stewart, Thurgood Marshall, William O. Douglas


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

21 June 1973


The Court ruled that obscene films did not automatically get First Amendment protection simply because they are shown for adults only.

Related Cases

  • Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
  • Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967).


Green, Jonathon. The Encyclopedia of Censorship. New York: Facts on File, 1990.

Further Readings

  • Cushman, Robert F. Leading Constitutional Decisions Prentice Hall. 1977.
  • "Hard-Nosed About Hard-Core." Time, July 2, 1973.
  • Johnson, John W., ed. Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
Patty Hearst Trial: 1976 - Patty Becomes Tania, Captured And Arrested, Defendant Takes The Stand, Psychiatrists Testify Of Brainwashing [next] [back] Parham v. J. R. - Significance, Two Tragic Predicaments, The Due Process Argument, Minors And The Constitution

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or