Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

United States v. Sokolow - Significance, A Brief And Unusual Trip, A Successful Police Operation, An Invasion Of Privacy

criminal law court petitioner

Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Andrew Sokolow

Petitioner's Claim

That agents of the United States Drug Enforcement Agency had probable cause to suspect that Sokolow was in possession of an illegal substance, and were legally justified under the Fourth Amendment in detaining Sokolow and searching his belongings.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Paul J. Larkin, Jr.

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Robert P. Goldberg

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

3 April 1989

Decision

Upheld the position of the United States, overturning the ruling of the court of appeals and holding that law enforcement officers can detain an individual if they have a "reasonable suspicion" that the individual is engaging or about to engage in criminal activity, even without probable cause to believe that any criminal action has or will occur.

Related Cases

  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
  • INS v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210 (1984).
  • United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985).

Further Readings

  • Burnett, Arthur L. "Permeation of Race, National Origin, and Gender Issues from Initial Law Enforcement Contact Through Sentencing." American Criminal Law Review, summer 1994, p. 1153.
  • "25th Annual Review of Criminal Procedure." Georgetown Law Journal. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, April 1996.
University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC - Significance, Two Claims Lead To One Question, No Academic Institutional Privilege, Impact, Further Readings [next] [back] United States v. Fordice - Significance, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

heyy i didnt mean to right thatt nd send it ... SORRY !!

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

niggah omg you did a good job for this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>