United States v. Fordice
Significance, Further Readings
Petitioner
United States
Respondent
Kirk Fordice
Petitioner's Claim
That the State of Mississippi failed to fulfill its duty under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in dismantling the state's "separate but equal" university educational system.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Kenneth Wilson Starr, U.S. Solicitor General in case No. 90-1205, and Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr. in case No. 90-6588
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
William F. Goodman, Jr.
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
Antonin Scalia
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
26 June 1992
Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court held that Mississippi did not meet statutory requirements in dismantling a racially-discriminatory, dual-tiered university system that was in violation of the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI).
Related Cases
- Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
- Brown v. Board of Education II, 349 U.S. 294 (1955).
- Green v. School Bd. of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1968).
Additional topics
- United States v. Sokolow - Significance, A Brief And Unusual Trip, A Successful Police Operation, An Invasion Of Privacy
- United States v. Eichman - Significance, Court Declares Federal Flag Protection Act Unconstitutional, Further Readings
- United States v. Fordice - Further Readings
- United States v. Fordice - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994