Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC - Significance, Two Claims Lead To One Question, No Academic Institutional Privilege, Impact, Further Readings

court decision petitioner common

Petitioner

University of Pennsylvania

Respondent

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Petitioner's Claim

That the university has special privilege grounded in either common law or the First Amendment to prohibit disclosure of peer review materials relevant to racial, sexual, or national origin discrimination claims in tenure decisions.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Rex E. Lee

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Kenneth Winston Starr, U.S. Solicitor General

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, Thurgood Marshall, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

9 January 1990

Decision

In a unanimous decision, upheld the court of appeals finding that neither common law nor a First Amendment academic freedom privilege protects peer review tenure materials.

Related Cases

  • Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957).
  • Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972).
  • Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
  • Jaffe v. Redmond, 116 S.Ct. 1923 (1996).
Wanda Holloway Trial: 1991 - Tapes Lead To Conviction, Plea Agreement Ends Second Trial [next] [back] United States v. Sokolow - Significance, A Brief And Unusual Trip, A Successful Police Operation, An Invasion Of Privacy

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or