Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1981 to 1988

Lassiter v. Department of Social Services - Significance, Further Readings

petitioner william clause chief

Petitioner

Abby Gail Lassiter

Respondent

Department of Social Services of Durham County, North Carolina

Petitioner's Claim

Because she was indigent, the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause dictated that the state provide her with counsel.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Leowen Evans

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Thomas Russell Odom

Justices for the Court

Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

1 June 1981

Decision

Refusing to appoint counsel for an indigent parent in proceedings terminating parental status was found not to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Related Cases

  • Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897).
  • Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942).
  • Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
  • Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972).
  • Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975).
  • Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979).
AFL-CIO C.L.C.v. City of Cleveland Local Number International Association of Firefighters (93,) - Significance, Further Readings [next] [back] Kolender v. Lawson - Significance, Impact

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 9 years ago

As the attorney who representyed the Respondent in this cause, I disagree with the statement that "the child died". He did not, and as far as I know, is still very much alive.