Johnson v. Louisiana
Significance, Impact
Appellant
Frank Johnson
Appellee
State of Louisiana
Appellant's Claim
Louisiana's constitutional provisions, which allowed less-than-unanimous guilty verdicts in criminal cases, violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Richard A. Buckley
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Louise Korns
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
22 May 1972
Decision
The reasonable doubt standard contained in the Due Process Clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment was not violated by nonunanimous jury verdicts.
Related Cases
- Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581 (1900).
- Jordan v. Massachusetts, 225 U.S. 167 (1912).
- Andres v. United States, 333 U.S. 740 (1948).
- Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).
- Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972).
Further Readings
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Northwestern University. Oyez, oyez, oyez-A U.S. Supreme Court Database. http://court.it-services.nwu.edu/oyez/cases
Additional topics
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. - Significance, The Same Right As White Citizens
- John Marshall Branion Trial: 1968 - Imperfect Alibi, Illicit Love, On The Run
- Johnson v. Louisiana - Significance
- Johnson v. Louisiana - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972