Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston
Significance, Parades Are Expression Too, Impact, Further Readings
Petitioner
John J. Hurley and South Boston Allied War Veterans Council
Respondent
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, et al.
Petitioner's Claim
That First Amendment Freedom of Speech protection extends to a private organizer's choice of which groups can participate in Boston's St. Patrick's Day Parade based on the content of their intended messages.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
Chester Darling and Dwight G. Duncan
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John Ward
Justices for the Court
Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter (writing for the Court), John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
19 June 1995
Decision
Upheld the parade organizer's claim and overturned two lower courts' decisions that banned the organizer's practice of excluding groups from parades due to the messages they express.
Related Cases
- Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963).
- Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111 (1969).
- Spence v. Washington, 418 U.S. 405 (1974).
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC., 520 U.S. 180 (1997).
Additional topics
- In re Marriage of Buzzanca - Significance, Impact, Further Readings
- Hopwood v. Texas - Significance, Denied Admission, Millions In Damages, The Terms Of The Complaint, The Former Policy
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston - Significance
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston - Further Readings
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston - Parades Are Expression Too
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present