In re Marriage of Buzzanca
Significance, Impact, Further Readings
Appellant
Luanne H. Buzzanca
Appellee
John A. Buzzanca
Appellant's Claim
That she should receive support for the child born because she and her then-husband initiated medical procedures to create the child.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Robert R. Walmsley
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Thomas P. Stabile
Judges for the Court
Thomas F. Crosby, Jr., David G. Sills (writing for the court), Edward J. Wallin
Judges Dissenting
None
Place
Santa Ana, California
Date of Decision
10 March 1998
Decision
Reversed the decision of the trial court and declared the Buzzancas the lawful parents of Jaycee. Remanded the matter of child support so that an appropriate permanent child support order could be made.
Additional topics
- Jenny Jones Trials: 1996-99 - Schmitz Guns Down His "admirer", Jenny Jones Show Sued
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston - Significance, Parades Are Expression Too, Impact, Further Readings
- In re Marriage of Buzzanca - Significance
- In re Marriage of Buzzanca - Further Readings
- In re Marriage of Buzzanca - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present