Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit
"at War With The Federal License"
Justices Douglas and Frankfurter strongly disagreed with the majority opinion. They argued that, "[t]he requirements of the Detroit smoke ordinance are squarely in conflict with the federal statute." The dissenters agreed that there were many areas in which local regulations might be added to federal ones. Speed limits, traffic regulations, or rules for using a dock might all exist alongside of federal laws for inspecting and licensing boats. But, wrote Douglas, in those cases:
. . . we would have local laws not at war with the federal license, but complementary to it . . . This case [on the other hand] . . . involves the collision between a local law and a federal law . . .
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Local Vs. Federal Control
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Regulating Interstate Commerce
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Significance, Hand-fired Boilers And Coal Smoke, Regulating Interstate Commerce, "at War With The Federal License"