Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Significance, Hand-fired Boilers And Coal Smoke, Regulating Interstate Commerce, "at War With The Federal License"

law appellant ships appellee

Appellant

Huron Portland Cement Co.

Appellee

City of Detroit

Appellant's Claim

That the city of Detroit had no right to enforce a local anti-pollution ordinance against ships owned by the Huron Portland Cement Company, given that those ships had been "inspected, approved and licensed" by the Federal Government for interstate commerce; moreover, even if Detroit's law was not in conflict with federal law, enforcement of the statute was an unreasonable restraint of interstate commerce.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

John F. Hathaway

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Alfred E. Lindbloom

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker

Justices Dissenting

William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 April 1960

Decision

That the Detroit anti-smoke ordinance was constitutional, even when applied to ships licensed by the federal government, and that the criminal provisions of the Detroit law did not impose "an undue burden" on interstate commerce.

Related Cases

South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell, 303 U.S. 177 (1938).
Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ex rel. Sullivan, 325 U.S. 761 (1945).
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines Inc., 359 U.S. 520 (1959).
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Ad. Comm., 432 U.S. 333 (1977).
Kassell v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 450 U.S. 662 (1981).

Sources

Davies, J. Clarence, and Jan Mazurek. Pollution Control in the United States: Evaluating the System. Resources for the Future, 1998.

Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Hand-fired Boilers And Coal Smoke

The Huron Portland Cement Co. was a Michigan company engaged in the manufacture and sale of cement. Its fleet of five vessels traveled across the Great Lakes, carrying cement to various customers from its mill in Alpena, Michigan. Huron Portland Cement Co. had made certain to have all its ships inspected, approved, and licensed by the U.S. Coast Guard. However, two of its vessels, the S.S. S.T. Cr…

Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Regulating Interstate Commerce

The company argued that the Detroit laws were clearly unreasonable. They imposed an unfair burden on interstate commerce, and on those grounds alone, they should be found unconstitutional. The Supreme Court did not agree. When it finally heard the case on appeal, the Court found that the Detroit laws were completely justified. Writing for the majority, Justice Stewart explained:The ordinance was e…

Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - Early Pollution Regulations

Major pollution regulation is administered by the federal government in cooperation with the states. Efforts to regulate pollution began before World War II. Early pollution regulation focused on preserving clean air and drinking water. The rapid increase of industrial output in the United States brought on greater challenges for the environment in such areas as hazardous waste disposal, ozone dep…

Citing this material

Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.

Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.