less than 1 minute read

Stanley v. Georgia

Impact

Two years later in United States v. Reidel (1971), the Court did not extend the same rights to the distribution of pornographic material. While the Court acknowledged the First Amendment right for an individual to have obscene material distributing such material was not afforded the same protections because that material could be sent to children. In later cases the Court has said that obscene materials are not protected by the First Amendment, but any such statutes must be limited.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972Stanley v. Georgia - Obscene Materials, Privacy And The First Amendment, Impact, Related Cases