Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere
Significance, Unfair Labor Practices Charged, Property Rights Upheld, Minority Opinion, Impact
National Labor Relations Board
That prohibiting distribution of organizational literature and evicting non-employees for trespassing on private parking property was justifiable.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Robert P. Joy
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Michael R. Dreeben
Justices for the Court
Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas (writing for the Court)
Harry A. Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Date of Decision
27 January 1992
Lechmere, Inc. did not violate the National Labor Party Act by forbidding communication between non-employee union organizers and (Lechmere) employees on private parking property.
- NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (1956).
- Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB, 407 U.S. 539 (1972).
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 (1976).
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Lee v. Weisman - Significance, Political Landscape, Graduation Traditions, Application Of Lemon, A Test For Lemon, Impact
- Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District - Significance, Was The School District Discriminatory?, Federal Court, Further Readings
- Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere - Significance
- Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere - Unfair Labor Practices Charged
- Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere - Property Rights Upheld
- Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere - Minority Opinion
- Inc. v. NLRB Lechmere - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias