Munn v. Illinois - Setting The Boundary Between State And Federal Regulation, Further Readings
Munn & Scott
State of Illinois
That the state law of Illinois requiring that a warehouse operate under a state license and that it conform to state-set rates violated the due process guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
W. C. Goudy, John N.Jewett
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Attorney General of Illinois
Justices for the Court
Joseph P. Bradley, Nathan Clifford, David Davis, Ward Hunt, Samuel Freeman Miller, Noah Haynes Swayne, Morrison Remick Waite (writing for the Court)
Stephen Johnson Field, William Strong
Date of Decision
1 March 1877
That it was appropriate for the state to regulate a state activity; that even though grain elevators operated as part of an interstate network of commerce, it was legitimate for the state to regulate them as long as Congress had not legislated in the area; that the act of Illinois setting up state regulation was not repugnant to the Constitution.
The decision demarcated between strictly state regulation of domestic commerce within a state and interstate commerce which should be regulated by Congress; it further indicated that business activities were protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, even though that amendment had been passed to protect former slaves.
- Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wallace 36 (1873).
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 217 U.S. 563 (1900).
- Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502 (1934).
- Packard v. Packard - Significance, Reverend Packard's Case Against His Wife, Mrs. Packard Defends Her Sanity
- Mississippi v. Johnson - Significance, The Case Against Johnson And The Reconstruction Act, The Court Says No, Salmon Portland Chase
- Munn v. Illinois - Further Readings
- Munn v. Illinois - Setting The Boundary Between State And Federal Regulation
- Other Free Encyclopedias