Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882

Mississippi v. Johnson - Significance, The Case Against Johnson And The Reconstruction Act, The Court Says No, Salmon Portland Chase

plaintiff west chief claim

Plaintiff

State of Mississippi

Defendants

Andrew Johnson, General Edward O. C. Ord

Plaintiff's Claim

That the Supreme Court should prevent President Andrew Johnson from carrying out the provisions of the Reconstruction Act of 1867.

Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff

W. L. Sharkey, R. J. Walker

Chief Defense Lawyer

Henry Stanberry, U.S. Attorney General

Justices for the Court

Salmon Portland Chase (writing for the Court), Nathan Clifford, David Davis, Stephen Johnson Field, Robert Cooper Grier, Samuel Freeman Miller, Samuel Nelson, Noah Haynes Swayne, James Moore Wayne

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

15 April 1867

Decision

Denied plaintiff's claim.

Related Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
  • Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866).
  • Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.

Munn v. Illinois - Setting The Boundary Between State And Federal Regulation, Further Readings [next] [back] Minor v. Happersett - Significance, The "new Departure", A Constitutional Approach, All Or Nothing, The Fourteenth Amendment

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or