Nebbia v. New York
Significance, Supreme Court Declares That The State Can Regulate Any Business, Related Cases, Public Enterprise And Private Enterprise
People of the State of New York
That the government had no power to regulate retail prices for milk sales.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Arthur E. Sutherland
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Henry S. Manley
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Benjamin N. Cardozo, Charles Evans Hughes, Owen Josephus Roberts (writing for the Court), Harlan Fiske Stone
Pierce Butler, James Clark McReynolds, George Sutherland, Willis Van Devanter
Date of Decision
5 March 1934
The Supreme Court upheld the New York Milk Control Act of 1933.
Scruton, Roger. A Dictionary of Political Thought, second edition. London: Macmillan, 1996.
- New York v. Sanger - Significance, Up From Poverty, Comstock's Law, Civilly Disobedient, The Door Is Opened
- Near v. Minnesota - Significance, Prior Restraint, Further Readings
- Nebbia v. New York - Further Readings
- Nebbia v. New York - Significance
- Nebbia v. New York - Supreme Court Declares That The State Can Regulate Any Business
- Nebbia v. New York - Related Cases
- Nebbia v. New York - Public Enterprise And Private Enterprise
- Other Free Encyclopedias