Near v. Minnesota
Significance, Prior Restraint, Further Readings
Appellant
J. M. Near
Appellee
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Floyd B. Olson, County Attorney of Hennepin County
Appellant's Claim
That a state "gag law" preventing publication of his newspaper constitutes prior restraint prohibited by the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Weymouth Kirkland, T. E. Latimer
Chief Lawyers for Appellee
James E. Markham, Arthur L. Markve
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Evans Hughes (writing for the Court), Owen Josephus Roberts, Harlan Fiske Stone
Justices Dissenting
Pierce Butler, James Clark McReynolds, George Sutherland, Willis Van Devanter
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
1 June 1931
Decision
The Supreme Court struck down the gag law.
Related Cases
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923).
- Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 625 (1925).
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931).
- New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).
Sources
Cornell. http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/.
First Amendment Center--Press. http://www.fac.org/press/press97.htm.
Additional topics
- Nebbia v. New York - Significance, Supreme Court Declares That The State Can Regulate Any Business, Related Cases, Public Enterprise And Private Enterprise
- Near v. Minnesota - Further Readings
- Near v. Minnesota - Significance
- Near v. Minnesota - Further Readings
- Near v. Minnesota - Prior Restraint
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940