United States v. Bestfoods - Significance, Don't Drink The Water, Shifting The Burden To The Responsible Parties, A Question Of Parenthood
CPC International Inc. (later renamed Bestfoods), Aerojet-General Corporation, Cordova Chemical Company, Cordova Chemical Company of Michigan
That CPC International was liable, under Section 107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) for costs of cleaning up industrial waste at a former subsidiary's chemical plant.
Justices for the Court
Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter (writing for the Court), John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Date of Decision
8 June 1998
That the petitioner had failed to establish CPC/Bestfoods's parental responsibility, either in a direct or derivative sense, for the environmental damage in question.
- Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Minneapolis Civic and Commerce Assn., 247 U.S. 490 (1918).
- Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256 (1979).
- Exxon Corp. v. Hunt, 475 U.S. 355 (1986).
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U.S. 1 (1989).
- United States v. Texas, 507 U.S. 529 (1993).
- United States v. Lopez - Significance, Court Of Appeals Ruling, Supreme Court Ruling, Implications, Related Cases, Further Readings
- United States v. Armstrong - Significance, Selective Prosecution Claims, Judicial Vigilance Necessary In Drug Prosecutions, Related Cases, Further Readings
- United States v. Bestfoods - Significance
- United States v. Bestfoods - Further Readings
- United States v. Bestfoods - Don't Drink The Water
- United States v. Bestfoods - Shifting The Burden To The Responsible Parties
- United States v. Bestfoods - A Question Of Parenthood
- United States v. Bestfoods - "a Relaxed, Cercla-specific Rule Of Derivative Liability"
- United States v. Bestfoods - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias