New York C & A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown
Significance, Further Readings
C & A Carbone, Inc.
Town of Clarkstown, New York
That a Clarkstown ordinance requiring all haulers to deposit waste at a private transfer station in return for deeding over the station to the city in five years violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Betty Jo Christian
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
William C. Brashares
Justices for the Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy (writing for the Court), Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Harry A. Blackmun, William H. Rehnquist, David H. Souter
Date of Decision
16 May 1994
An ordinance enabling Clarkstown, New York to obtain title to a waste station in return for requiring all waste haulers to use the station under private ownership for five years discriminated in interstate commerce.
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617 (1978).
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, 504 U.S. 334 (1992).
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, 504 U.S. 353 (1992).
- California v. Acevedo - Significance, A Uniform Rule For Vehicle Searches, Dissent Finds Warrantless Search Unacceptable, Impact, Kids, Drugs, And Crime
- Board of Education of Kiryas Joel v. Grumet - Kiryas Joel, Retrenchment And Renewed Controversy, Lower Court Rulings, Challenging The Lemon Test, Legal Impact
- New York C A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown - Significance
- New York C A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown - Further Readings
- Other Free Encyclopedias