Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

California v. Acevedo - Significance, A Uniform Rule For Vehicle Searches, Dissent Finds Warrantless Search Unacceptable, Impact, Kids, Drugs, And Crime

court united petitioner decision


State of California


Charles Steven Acevedo

Petitioner's Claim

That police may search a container seized from an automobile where there is probable cause to believe that the container holds evidence or an illegal substance.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Robert M. Foster

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Frederick Westcott Anderson

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter

Justices Dissenting

Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

30 May 1991


Marijuana seized from defendant's car could be admitted into evidence at defendant's trial on drug charges. Reversed lower court decision barring admission of marijuana because police had not procured search warrant.

Related Cases

  • United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979).
  • United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982).
  • United States v. Cook, 938 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1991).
  • United States v. Corral, 970 F.2d 719 (10th Cir. 1992).


Morgan, Kathleen O'Leary, et al., eds. Crime State Rankings. Lawrence, KS: Morgan Quitno, 1994.

Further Readings

  • Bernheim, David. Defense of Narcotics Cases. New York: Matthew Bender, 1997.
  • Bradley, Craig M. "The Court's `Two Model' Approach to the Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, fall 1993, p. 429.
California v. Hodari D. - Significance, When Questioning Is Seizure, An Erosion Of Fourth Amendment Rights?, Impact [next] [back] New York C A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown - Significance, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

i dont really think this is usefull at all!

and you guys suck my big toe!

Vote down Vote up

over 11 years ago

Thanks for having this page. I really didnt like going through the whole case file on some of the other sites. This gave a very clear summary and I am happy for that. Though it could have been a bit longer stating each sides view though. (4.5/5)