New York C & A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown
Significance, Further Readings
Petitioner
C & A Carbone, Inc.
Respondent
Town of Clarkstown, New York
Petitioner's Claim
That a Clarkstown ordinance requiring all haulers to deposit waste at a private transfer station in return for deeding over the station to the city in five years violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Betty Jo Christian
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
William C. Brashares
Justices for the Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy (writing for the Court), Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Justices Dissenting
Harry A. Blackmun, William H. Rehnquist, David H. Souter
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
16 May 1994
Decision
An ordinance enabling Clarkstown, New York to obtain title to a waste station in return for requiring all waste haulers to use the station under private ownership for five years discriminated in interstate commerce.
Related Cases
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617 (1978).
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, 504 U.S. 334 (1992).
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, 504 U.S. 353 (1992).
Additional topics
- California v. Acevedo - Significance, A Uniform Rule For Vehicle Searches, Dissent Finds Warrantless Search Unacceptable, Impact, Kids, Drugs, And Crime
- Board of Education of Kiryas Joel v. Grumet - Kiryas Joel, Retrenchment And Renewed Controversy, Lower Court Rulings, Challenging The Lemon Test, Legal Impact
- New York C A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown - Significance
- New York C A Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown - Further Readings
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994