Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - Significance, When May A State Regulate Interstate Commerce?, Illinois' Peculiar Mudguards, Small Benefits Do Not Justify Great Costs
State of Illinois
Navajo Freight Lines and other interstate trucking companies
Illinois should be allowed to require contoured mudguards on the rear fenders of trucks and trailers.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Felix Frankfurter, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker
Date of Decision
25 May 1959
lllinois may not require contoured rear mudguards.
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 (1945).
- Raymond Motor Transp., Inc. v. Rice, 417 F.Supp. 1352 (1976).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law.Volume 1. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing, 1998.
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Gavit, Bernard. The Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. New York: AMS Press, 1970.
- Tribe, Laurence. American Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. Mineola, NY: Foundation, 1978.
- Bolling v. Sharpe - Significance, Separate Can Never Be Equal, "due Process" Requires "equal Protection", Further Readings
- Berman v. Parker - Significance, Rebuilding The Nation's Capital, There Are No Limits On The Public's Needs
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - Significance
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - When May A State Regulate Interstate Commerce?
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - Illinois' Peculiar Mudguards
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - Small Benefits Do Not Justify Great Costs
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines - Interstate Commerce Act Of 1887
- Other Free Encyclopedias