Harris v. Forklift
Significance, Harris Files A Lawsuit, Discrimination By Any Other Name, Justice Clarence Thomas, Further Readings
Forklift Systems, Inc.
That she was sexually harassed by the owner.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Stanley M. Chernau
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas
Date of Decision
9 November 1993
The Court found that Teresa Harris did work in a sexually abusive environment.
- Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (1982).
- DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association, 51 F.3d 591 (1995).
- Ascolese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 902 F.Supp. 533 (1995).
- E.E.O.C. v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc., 990 F.Supp. 1059 (1998).
- Etter v. Veriflo Corporation, 67 Cal.App.4th 457 (1998).
The World Almanac and Book of Facts, 1994. Mahwah, NJ: Funk & Wagnalls, Corp., 1993. http://www.capitaloutlook.com/
- Hodgson v. Minnesota - Judicial Background, The Case At Hand, The Lower Courts Rule, The Supreme Court Affirms The Court Of Appeals Decision
- Gregory v. Ashcroft - Judges Challenge Mandatory Retirement, Both Claims Overturned Again, Petitioners Assert Portions Of Act Not Applicable
- Harris v. Forklift - Further Readings
- Harris v. Forklift - Significance
- Harris v. Forklift - Harris Files A Lawsuit
- Harris v. Forklift - Discrimination By Any Other Name
- Harris v. Forklift - Justice Clarence Thomas
- Other Free Encyclopedias