Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji
The Facts Of The Case, The Lower Courts Rule, The Supreme Court Affirms
Saint Francis College et al.
Majid Ghaidan Al-Khazraji, etc.
That a section of the U.S. Code barring racial discrimination did not apply to persons of Arab ancestry.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
Nick S. Fisfis
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Date of Decision
18 May 1987
Affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals and granted the respondent the right to state his claim of racial discrimination against St. Francis College.
The Supreme Court's decision in Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji clarified the criteria for making a racial discrimination claim under section 1981 of the U.S. Code.
The decision issued by the Supreme Court in Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji established clear guidelines for future discrimination claims under Section 1981 of the U.S. Code. It reaffirmed the Court's long-standing opinion that, as Justice Brennan observed in his concurring opinion, "pernicious distinctions among individuals based solely on their ancestry are antithetical to the doctrine of equality upon which this nation is founded."
- McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987).
- Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 485 U.S. 617 (1988).
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School District, 491 U.S. 701 (1989).
- Lampf v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350 (1991).
- Santosky v. Kramer - Significance, Further Readings
- Rostker v. Goldberg - Significance, President Carter Reactivates The Selective Service System, Validity Of Rostker Questioned, Women And The Selective Service Exemption
- Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji - The Facts Of The Case
- Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji - The Lower Courts Rule
- Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji - The Supreme Court Affirms
- Other Free Encyclopedias