less than 1 minute read

Martin v. Wilks

Significance, Reverse Discrimination, Further Readings

Petitioner

Robert K. Wilks, et al.

Respondent

John W. Martin, et al.

Petitioner's Claim

That less qualified African Americans were being promoted instead of more qualified caucasians.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Chief Lawyers for Respondent

Robert D. Joffe, James P. Alexander

Justices for the Court

Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

12 June 1989

Decision

Caucasian firefighters not involved in previous civil rights litigation were allowed to claim that promotion decisions after the previous consent decrees were racially discriminatory.

Related Cases

  • Firefighters v. Cleveland, 478 U.S. 501 (1986).
  • Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 (1986).
  • Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Taxman, 91 F.3d. 1547 (1996).

Sources

Constitutional Law, thirteenth edition. New York: The Foundation Press Inc.,1997.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994