Arizona v. Hicks
Significance, Impact, Further Readings
State of Arizona
That a search of Hicks's apartment was legal under the Fourth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Linda A. Akers
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John W. Rood III
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Antonin Scalia (writing for the Court), John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Sandra Day O'Connor
Date of Decision
3 March 1987
Upheld two lower courts' decisions that the search was a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).
- Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971).
- Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343 (1977).
- Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983).
- Illinois v. Andreas, 463 U.S. 765 (1983).
- Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985).
- Batson v. Kentucky - Significance, Selecting The Jury, The Decision, Broadened In Scope, Further Readings
- Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris - Significance
- Arizona v. Hicks - Further Readings
- Arizona v. Hicks - Significance
- Arizona v. Hicks - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias