United States v. Lee
Significance, Search On High Seas Lawful, Was There A High Seas Search?, Impact, Related Cases
Lee, et al.
That the Coast Guard's search and seizure of an American vessel on the high seas more that 12 miles from land and the subsequent arrest of persons on the vessel for violations of the Tariff Act and the National Prohibition Act was lawful.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
John G. Sargent, U.S. Attorney General
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis (writing for the Court), Pierce Butler, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Clark McReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford, Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft, Willis Van Devanter
Date of Decision
31 May 1927
The search and seizure of the vessel on the high seas and the arrest of persons on the vessel was lawful because probable cause existed to believe that revenue laws were being violated.
- United States v. Miller - Sawed-off Shotguns The Second Amendment, Preserving A Well-regulated Militia, The Brady Bill
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. - Significance, Court Upholds Broad Presidential Powers In Foreign Affairs, Further Readings
- United States v. Lee - Further Readings
- United States v. Lee - Significance
- United States v. Lee - Search On High Seas Lawful
- United States v. Lee - Was There A High Seas Search?
- United States v. Lee - Impact
- United States v. Lee - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias