Ballew v. Georgia
Significance, Fulton County Looks Behind The Green Door, The Court's Social-science Approach
Claude Davis Ballew
State of Georgia
That a Georgia law providing for juries of only five persons was in violation of the right to trial by jury guaranteed in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, and that by depriving the petitioner of his rights, this law further violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Leonard W. Rhodes
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Date of Decision
21 March 1978
That by depriving the petitioner of his right to trial by jury, the state of Georgia had violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
- Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).
- Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).
- Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 100 (1970).
- Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356 (1972).
- Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972).
- Colegrove v. Battin, 413 U.S. 149 (1973).
- Sanders v. Georgia, 424 U.S. 931 (1976).
Grunwald, Michael. "Lawsuit Surge May Cost U.S. Billions; 125 Claims Allege Breach of Contract." The Washington Post, August 10, 1998.
- Bates v. State Bar of Arizona - Significance, Commercial Speech Doctrine Extended To Lawyer Advertising, Advertising Lawyers, Further Readings
- Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Game Commission - Significance
- Ballew v. Georgia - Significance
- Ballew v. Georgia - Further Readings
- Ballew v. Georgia - Fulton County Looks Behind The Green Door
- Ballew v. Georgia - The Court's Social-science Approach
- Ballew v. Georgia - Concurrence: "a Line Has To Be Drawn Somewhere"
- Ballew v. Georgia - Impact
- Ballew v. Georgia - The Savings And Loan Scandal
- Other Free Encyclopedias