Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Game Commission
Significance
Appellant
Lester Baldwin, et al.
Appellee
Fish and Game Commission of Montana
Appellant's Claim
That Montana's state game regulations violated Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
James H. Goetz
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Paul A. Lenzini
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Potter Stewart
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 May 1978
Decision
Montana's state fish and game laws were constitutional, and the appellant was not entitled to any relief from them.
Related Cases
- Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 U.S. 518 (1978).
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper, 470 U.S. 274 (1985).
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman, 487 U.S. 59 (1988).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Lund, Thomas Alan. American Wildlife Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
Additional topics
- Ballew v. Georgia - Significance, Fulton County Looks Behind The Green Door, The Court's Social-science Approach
- Bakke V. University of California … Appeal: 1978 - Reverse Discrimination Claimed, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Game Commission - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980