less than 1 minute read

Arizona v. Evans - Significance, Tempting Arrest, The Exclusionary Rule, Reagan-era Reversal, The Decision, A Growing Movement To Rescind The Exclusionary Rule

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Petitioner

State of Arizona

Respondent

Isaac Evans

Petitioner's Claim

That a computer error in law-enforcement files did not result in an unlawful search, and that contraband obtained in that search may be admitted in court.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Gerald Grant

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Carol Carrigan

Justices for the Court

Stephen Breyer, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

1 March 1995

Decision

The Court ruled in favor of the state of Arizona's appeal to admit evidence obtained in a search that was underway as a result of computer error.

Related Cases

  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • United States v. Mackey, 387 F.Supp. 1121 (1975).
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).

Sources

http://www.gopac.org

Congressional Quarterly Digest. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997.

Additional topics