Bartkus v. Illinois
Significance, The Bill Of Rights Does Not Restrict The States, Double Jeopardy Is Wholly Uncivilized
State of Illinois
The Supreme Court should void his conviction for bank robbery by an Illinois court. A federal court already had tried and had acquitted him of the same crime.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Walter R. Fisher
Chief Lawyers for Appellee
William C. Wines, Latham Castle
Justices for the Court
Tom C. Clark, Felix Frankfurter (writing for the Court), John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Charles Evans Whittaker
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Earl Warren
Date of Decision
30 March 1959
The Court denied Bartkus' appeal and affirmed his conviction. His second trial after a prior acquittal did not deny Bartkus due process of law.
- Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969).
- Ball, Howard, and Philip Cooper. Of Power and Right: Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and America's Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Berman v. Parker - Significance, Rebuilding The Nation's Capital, There Are No Limits On The Public's Needs
- Barenblatt v. United States - Significance, Government Interest In Self-preservation Found To Outweigh First Amendment Concerns, The Hollywood Ten
- Bartkus v. Illinois - Significance
- Bartkus v. Illinois - The Bill Of Rights Does Not Restrict The States
- Bartkus v. Illinois - Double Jeopardy Is Wholly Uncivilized
- Other Free Encyclopedias