less than 1 minute read

Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center

Further Readings

  • Cembalest, Robin. "Who Does it Shock? Why Does it Shock?" Artnews. March 1992, p. 32-33.
  • "The Obscenity Trial: How They Voted to Acquit." Artnews. December 1990, pp. 136-141.
  • Gurstein, Rochelle. "Current Debate: High Art or Hard-Core? Misjudging Mapplethorpe: the Art Scene and the Obscene." Tikkun. November-December 1991, pp. 70-80.
  • Herbert, Wray. "Is Porn Un-American?" U.S. News & World Report, July 3, 1995, p. 51.
  • Light, Judy. "Jury Acquits Museum in Landmark Art Trial." Dancemagazine. December 1990, pp. 12-13.
  • Merkel, Jayne. "Art on Trial." Art in America. December 1990, pp. 41-46.
  • Parachini, Allan. "Year of the Censor; How Photography Became the Focus of Fear and Loathing." American Photo. November-December 1990, pp. 39-42.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Significance, Obscenity Or Art?, The Nea And Sexually Explicit Art, Further Readings