Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Significance, Obscenity Or Art?, The Nea And Sexually Explicit Art, Further Readings

plaintiff obscene decision photographs

Plaintiff

State of Ohio

Defendants

Dennis Barrie and the Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center

Plaintiff's Claim

That the exhibition of photographs by the artist Robert Mapplethorpe was obscene.

Chief Lawyers for the Plaintiff

Richard A. Castellini, Frank H. Prouty, Jr., and Melanie J. Reising

Chief Defense Lawyers

Marc D. Mezibov and H. Louis Sirkin

Judge

F. David J. Albanese

Place

Cincinnati, Ohio

Date of Decision

5 October 1990

Decision

The jury found the five photographs in question not to be obscene.

Related Cases

  • Kois v. Wisconsin, 408 U.S. 229 (1972).
  • Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).

Sources

"Governmental Patronage," Sinclair Community College. http://www.sinclair.edu

Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. - Significance, The Sacred Trust Between Reporter And Source, The Press Is Subject To The Same Laws As All Citizens [next] [back] Inc. v. City of Hialeah Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye - Significance

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or