Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994 » Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Significance, Obscenity Or Art?, The Nea And Sexually Explicit Art, Further Readings

Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Further Readings

december trial artnews american

  • Cembalest, Robin. "Who Does it Shock? Why Does it Shock?" Artnews. March 1992, p. 32-33.
  • "The Obscenity Trial: How They Voted to Acquit." Artnews. December 1990, pp. 136-141.
  • Gurstein, Rochelle. "Current Debate: High Art or Hard-Core? Misjudging Mapplethorpe: the Art Scene and the Obscene." Tikkun. November-December 1991, pp. 70-80.
  • Herbert, Wray. "Is Porn Un-American?" U.S. News & World Report, July 3, 1995, p. 51.
  • Light, Judy. "Jury Acquits Museum in Landmark Art Trial." Dancemagazine. December 1990, pp. 12-13.
  • Merkel, Jayne. "Art on Trial." Art in America. December 1990, pp. 41-46.
  • Parachini, Allan. "Year of the Censor; How Photography Became the Focus of Fear and Loathing." American Photo. November-December 1990, pp. 39-42.
Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center - Obscenity Or Art? [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or